View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old May 8th, 2008
RosenMcStern RosenMcStern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 183
Send a message via Skype™ to RosenMcStern
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterb View Post
In a real fight the real differencing factor would probably not be whether one of the combatants had a scimitar and the other a mace, but who had the greater skill and tactical ability.
Well, this is still true in BRP, because your average parrying weapon will absorb 1d6+2 or 1d8 in damage equally well, assuming you are skilled enough to parry. The difference is just that the scimitar is a bit more likely to cripple if it actually strikes an unarmored foe, while the mace has some extra chances to knock down a lightly armored foe (if you use the old rule of "halve soft armor vs. maces"). Which is somehow realistic. And, as you pointed out, much more fun.
Reply With Quote