Quote:
Originally Posted by McBard
The chief reason I decided to go with a single special/critical mechanic at 10% was that it can be determined without math calculation at all:
A d100 roll that ends in a '0' and succeeds is a special success.
A d100 roll that ends in a '0' and fails is a special failure.
Although I completely agree that the 5% or 20% calculation isn't too difficult to determine on the fly (no chart needed), I really like the game design elegance of the "roll ending in '0'" simplicity.
If you want to retain the 20% rate, just rule that any roll that ends in a '0' or a '5' is a special result. (This is how Harnmaster works, btw, and its the system from which I stole the idea...). I've never been a fan of the "super success" rule (i.e. criticals), but that's just me.
I think a single grain at 10% splits the difference between two at 5% and 20% just fine in game play.
|
This works just fine, but there is a psychological factor to consider as well. With the standard system, lower is ALWAYS better. With your system a 30 is better than a 02. Again, mathematically it is just fine, some people (including myself) just don't like the feel.