View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 29th, 2007
Atgxtg's Avatar
Atgxtg Atgxtg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightshade View Post
Not sure I agree; impaling is in some respects a reflection of an attack that hits dead on rather than slightly at an angle, and those _do_ tend to penetrate better.
It has to do with ballistics. Certain Class rated vests will stop certain slugs. With BRP, since the impale effect is double damage, then it results in a shot being able to penetrate twice the AP protection. This means than a 45 bullet that impales (2d10+4) penetrates better than a 30.06 (2d6+4). That's messed up. Likewise a .32 caliber bullet that implales has the penetrating power of a M16!

Since the spread is so large, the problem gets more pronounced with vehicles.

If the benefit is to represent the attacks ability to damage a person, then ballistic armor should come off first.

As a side note, this would be one way to distinguish between archaic armors and modern ones. That way a 5 point ballistic vest could stop a bullet better than might stop a bullet better than a 7 point shirt of maille.
Reply With Quote