Thread: Opposed rolls
View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old January 8th, 2008
Atgxtg's Avatar
Atgxtg Atgxtg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badcat View Post
No, that's not an issue at all. There is a difference between 'complicated' and a 'complication'...check your dictionary. I have no trouble with opposed rolls, there are simply better ways to run the game. Any game.

And hey, I never was a RQ player, so that doesn't apply either.
Cat, you missed his point. He said "The issue, however, is perceiving this as complicated in the first place."

It's all about perception. Something that you might perceive as as unnecessary, someone else might perceive as important. If often boils down to personal preferences, rather than absolutes.

For instance, many BRP players consider hit location to be an unecessary complication. Others feel that the benefits that hit locatives give outweight the added complexity. Same with the major wound rule, category modfiers, SAN rules and pretty much everything else that's been in one of more versions of the system.
__________________
Got Puppet?
Reply With Quote