Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightshade
So I'm kind of afraid I either don't buy the premise, or to the degree I do think that its no great loss; people so put off from reading this board that they don't want to publish probably _are_ better off not getting into this industry, because sooner or later it'll only give them grief if they don't have a halfway thick skin.
|
Yup. There will always be
some critic. You can't get it
all right, and you can't please
everybody. Still, I don't believe the product have been given a tough reception here either. Have a look at the MRQ boards, rude people saying their dog could have regurgitated better stuff and constant complaining about broken rules. What have we got here? Some disagreement about weapon tables, hit locations and vehicle rules?
Quote:
|
I understand why they did it; I understand why people wanted it; but I think the take home from Jason's comments is that it did turn some of the negativity up because people are essentially responding to an unedited draft in some ways as though it was a final product, and that's got to have added to his stress level pretty good.
|
Lost footnotes created a lot of misunderstandings, no doubt about that.
SGL.