Basic Roleplaying Forum |
|
Home Forum Downloads Reviews Wiki Gallery Links |
|
|||||||
| Register | Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
| View Poll Results: What to do about Glorantha? | |||
| Glorantha needs its own forum! It's a classic BRP setting! |
|
4 | 18.18% |
| An own Glorantha thread will do, maybe later separate forums for all the major settings. |
|
3 | 13.64% |
| Just let it pop up in the discussion here & there. No need to separate BRP & its setting yet. |
|
11 | 50.00% |
| Where the heck is the option I want to vote for? |
|
4 | 18.18% |
| Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
The problem is that if you have a dedicated Gloranthan Forum here then you will inevitibly get the same kind of meaningful discussion as on the old Gloranthan Digest or the World of Glorantha or even the Immoderate Glorantha group.
People will ask questions (I know, how could they?) in the forums and other people will offer their own opinions. Fine if the question is a simple one like "Who were the Lightbringers?" as that has an nice simple answer, but if the question is something tricky like "Who were the Lightbringers?" then that can open up a can of worms with many different posts from different people with different opinions.[*] At the moment, fortunately, the Forum benefits from the fact that there are no Gloranthan Heavyweights posting (no offence to anyone here who considers themselves as big Gloranthan Heavyweights) and that there are no D100 rules out yet. So, any discussion is lightweight. But, sure as eggs is eggs, if you had a Gloranthan Forum then the really big Gloranthan Hitters will flock here and bog down any discussion. Perhaps you cpuld include a link in the Forum's Homepage saying that any questions regarding in-depth Glorantha should be directed to the World of Glorantha group. Obviously, questions on how the rules work in Glorantha are fair game, as are stats of Gloranthan creatures, new spells and so on. But not questions on what colour are Uleria's Panties. The same could be said for other game worlds. There is an Ancient Rome supplement coming out. We could have an Ancient Rome Forum, but that would very quickly get bogged down in intellectual discussions about what types of trireme the Romans used or that there were no such things as Celts in the Roman Empire and other such discussions. I know nothing about Deadworld, only that it involves zombies. But if you hade a Deadworld Forum, then you'd get discussions about what happened in Comic number so-and-so and how that differed from such-and-such or that you couldn't possibly use RQ zombies as Deadworld zombies cannot speak and run fast, or whatever. So, I'd say NO to Forums for any of the game worlds. Otherwise, if you had a forum for Deadworld or Ancient Rome then some bright spark will say "I play RQ2/3 in Glorantha, why can't we have a Gloranthan Forum?" and then all hell will break loose. [*] Long term fans of Glorantha and the various Digests will know what I mean here. |
|
||||
|
Wow!
Soltakss, I disagree with you on this. I think separate forums for BRP setting/sorucebookls makes a lot of sense. Where or not they get thier own forum we will still get the threads about triremes, etc. Better to seapate things so that people will be able to fihnd the stuff for settings that interest them. That way the fantasy fans won't have to wade through the Sci-Fi or Superhero threads. There is another RPG site that I visit that actually gives a different section in each forum for each RPG. In part because the parent system was used for several settings (ala BRP) but also because one of the settings has been written up for several RPGs. Using BRP history as an example, I7d much rather see stats for, say, Elric! kept separate from pretty much any other BRP section. Reason being that a 100% weapon skill is Elric! isn't the same as a 100% weapon skill in Strombringer or RQ. At least by sectioning things off, the people who don't want to read about triremes won't have to see it. |
|
|||
|
I imagine Uleria has quite a collection of panties.
And she knows what ones you like too. Lacey white is your thing? She's got those. Neon Thongs? Them too. Black Leather - them too. I don't think there is any such thing as latex on Glorantha though. Maybe the Mostali have it, but they aren't sharing it (or making panties). And of course some times... ...never mind. Better to stop now. |
|
||||
|
Maybe we can have just a "Settings" forum for all settings. That way you can post about Glorantha or Deadworld or whatever, but it might not attract the notice of the Gloranthan "Sages"?
Hmmm... Almost feel like we are trying to avoid the Spanish Inquisition. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
(d100)[45] Made It! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If there is a separate forum for Glorantha, you can simply not click on that forum title, and you won't be bothered by it. If there is not, you will have people mentioning it in the common area, and then you will have to, as you put it, "wade through" it. Me personally, I could not care less about Greg's latest, but I do like the Glorantha setting, always have, especially for the deities and the stories.
__________________
The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." George Carlin (1937 - ) _____________ (92/420) |
|
||||
|
I think that being welcoming of people that are not enormously invested in previous settings is a perfectly valid point for compartmentalizing setting discussions, as is yours. Now we have two reasons for a settings forum!
![]() Joseph Paul Last edited by Joseph Paul : October 3rd, 2007 at 02:24. |