 |
||
Glorantha in own thread/forum or just where it pops up?
|
||
Basic Roleplaying Forum |
|
Home Forum Downloads Reviews Wiki Gallery Links |
|
|||||||
| Register | Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
| View Poll Results: What to do about Glorantha? | |||
| Glorantha needs its own forum! It's a classic BRP setting! |
  
|
4 | 18.18% |
| An own Glorantha thread will do, maybe later separate forums for all the major settings. |
  
|
3 | 13.64% |
| Just let it pop up in the discussion here & there. No need to separate BRP & its setting yet. |
  
|
11 | 50.00% |
| Where the heck is the option I want to vote for? |
  
|
4 | 18.18% |
| Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 3rd, 2007
|
|||
|
|||
Whatever. I would like to have an area free of Glorantha AND Greg, if possible. However that is accomplished is fine with me. Because those things got to be overwhelming on the Mongoose RQ forum last year, just pre-release. So I guess I want to have this main forum be specifically for BRP system discussion and have a separate section for Glorantha (including MRQ, since it is 'not' BRP). As such. Keep this for BRP rules discussions and homebrew settings for BRP if possible. Those rules discussions to include any game...earlier RQ, Stormbringer, CoC, etc. that specifically use BRP rules, again.
|
|
October 23rd, 2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
I say keep all settings in the Worlds of Wonder forum.
Just get the posters to put [Glorantha], [CoC], [DeadWorld], [Rome], etc. in their thread titles. That way those not interested can not bother reading those threads and those interested can. Also it allows everybody to see the different settings BRP and D100 can handle.
__________________
Darran Sims Furnace 2007 - http://www.rpgfurnace.com/ "A lack of planning on your part does not constitute an Emergency on my part"-http://darransims.livejournal.com/
|
|
October 23rd, 2007
|
|||
|
|||
|
There were plenty of things I liked about Glorantha... and 'stole' from it... but never really played there much.
I think BRP has outgrown that era of it's development and since it's no longer formally linked, and there are Glorantha forums elsewhere, it might as well not have any special place here.
|
|
October 23rd, 2007
|
|||
|
|||
|
I only briefly used even RQ for Glorantha, so I'm perhaps not the best one to ask, but I don't really think it deserves special treatment.
|
|
October 24th, 2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmm, I used to be able to go into the main forum and read all the topics.
Now, I have to remember to go into all the other forums as well. Get rid of the forums and drop everything back to the main one, please!
|
|
October 24th, 2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am sure you will get used to check the other forums too.
 BTW: I think the idea to open a forum (or more of them) for BRP fans only is absolutely phantastomatic! Thanks alot Trifle for this wonderful place for discussion and chilling out.
|
|
October 24th, 2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Cheers, Sverre.
|
|
October 24th, 2007
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like Glorantha for the most part, but not everything as time went by. I definitely did not having things "Gregged" on me. But as far as BRP goes, considering Glrorantha Hero wars has a hold on the 3rd age and Mongoose on the second I dont think we going to see much Glorantha stuff for BRP so only people that are really going to be running Glorantha stuff are Fossils like myself and we going to be doing it our way anyway.
I have started a 3rd age campaign in my own version of Glorantha but I like the fact most my players have no access to most of the stuff and have to take my word on how Glorantha works
|
Linear Mode
