Basic Roleplaying Central |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
J |
|
||||
|
Yes of course - but "nearby" in this case means about 50 light years, and
the astronomer I asked was quite convinced that in this case the radiation would kill of the plankton (and with it almost all life forms except those in the deep sea trenches with their own food supply from chemosynthesis in- stead of photosynthesis), but would not really damage the planet itself. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
You can also find some other local problem (in the planet) to kill out all life (volcanic activity, meteorite collision). It's just that a supernova is quite a drastic measure just to eliminate a few carbon units. But in any case, it's your setting so it's up to you. |
|
||||
|
Well, I decided to use the supernova because it has the added advantage
that it provides me with an "empty quarter" in space, a region where the colonists have no immediate rivals, and where they can discover relics of spacefaring cultures destroyed by the supernova. |
|
||||
|
Yes, it took my colonists almost thirty years to rebuild the plankton-fish-food-
chain, and they have just started (after fifty years) to reintroduce some co- ral reefs - and now they are looking for some more interesting creatures, be- sides the few dolphins, dugongs, whale sharks and wrillabees they already ha- ve. |
|
||||
|
Cephalopodes were no problem, but sea turtles gave and give me some head-
ache, as they need beaches to lay their eggs, and Pharos IV is a pure water world without any land (and therefore beaches) at all. I have a similar problem with sea birds, they also need at least some land to reproduce. Artificial isles might be a solution, but the colony's economy does not (yet) provide the ne- cessary means to spare resources for such "luxuries". |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|