Basic Roleplaying Forum

Home Forum Downloads Reviews Wiki Gallery Links

Go Back   BRP Central > The Basic Roleplaying Forum > Basic Roleplaying
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Hit location dice

Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old April 16th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 513
Default

Almost. I understand the new book is most similar to SB5, that way, so yes but the SB1 chart is simpler with fewer results. Stuff like, 'your right leg is amputated, lose 1d6 Dex and x movement' and so on. The chart in the new book will probably have provisions to dress up the effects (if it is like SB5), give some choices on the fly, like 'this happens, or this, depending on this' and 'like x, above, but worse'. It's more of a guide whereas the earlier SB1 version was more explicit. But the general idea and game effect should be about the same, yes. It has the advantage that you don't worry about where the hit is unless it truly is critical. No round to round tracking until someone does get seriously hurt. The really good thing about the upcoming BRP is that it looks as if everything can be modified to taste with a minimum of confusion. Sort of like GURPS with less in the way of attachments. Hmmm, better reserve judgement on that last. 384 pages of rules is a lot of rules for a game that up until now pretty much consisted of just a few dozen pages of game system rules. We'll soon see. I mean I will, most of the people with the 0 edition seem pleased with the content.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old April 16th, 2008
soltakss's Avatar
RQ Fogey
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trifletraxor View Post
Anyone thought of using anything like this instead of the old d20?
Not really.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Trifletraxor View Post
A d6 as location dice would cover
[table=head]d6|humanoid|four-legged
6|head|head
5|left arm|left front leg
4|right arm|right front leg
3|body|body
2|left leg|left hind leg
1|right leg|right hind leg
No chest/abdomen, all hit locations have the same chance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trifletraxor View Post
Humonoid and four-legged opponents cover at least 95% of all opponents in my games. If humnoid or four-legged with wings or two extra limbs, roll d8 and use 7 & 8 for extra appendage.
So, different dice for different body types. It takes the simplicity away from a very simple concept.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trifletraxor View Post
Haven't tried this myself, but though about it when seeing the dice.
I like the D20. If I were to change it, I'd use a D100, especially if I needed to roll crunchier locations - hands, feet, limb sections, areas of the body etc.

But a D20 is quick and easy and we have hit locations for a lot of body types from older versions of the RQ rules.
__________________
Simon Phipp

Wallowing in my elitism since 1982.

Never in a million years / 420


Many Systems, One Family

RQ/BRP Site (Not much BRP at the moment) www.soltakss.com/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old April 16th, 2008
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 36
Default

Am I the only one throwing non-humanoid opponants against the players? Even with a D20, we can be short on enough numbers to vary probabilities.

I've been playing with some blank D20s to make custom hit locations. I've gotten tired of the "I hit him in the 4...left leg...no, dummy that's for humans...oh yeah, hold on...tail..." dialog. But our game likes hit locations and the "we're battle-scarred survivors" effect that piecing armor together gives them.

Inking a bunch of Dice turned out to be a problem, and I'd have to keep them all sorted...eek. But your graphic gave me an inspiration. I'll try printing up some chits for hit location and have people draw from a bag. We'll see how that works.

Steve
__________________
The wait is almost over...
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old April 16th, 2008
The Last Conformist's Avatar
Lesser Servitor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 37
Send a message via ICQ to The Last Conformist Send a message via Skype™ to The Last Conformist
Default

I've got an old RPG* that used a special deck of cards to determine hit loc. Each card lists different locs for high, medium, and low melee attacks plus for ranged attacks and a special one for non-humanoid opponents, which has results like "wings (stomach)" meaning the creature's wings are hit if it's got any, else the stomach. It's clever in that it can handle quite different creatures with a single table.

(Something it doesn't handle well are creatures with more than four legs (six if you count wings).)


* It's called The Guide to Adventure and used to be available for free on the 'Net, but appears to've dropped of the edge of the earth.
__________________
The black rivers of pitch that flow under those mysterious cyclopean bridges - things built by some elder race extinct and forgotten before the beings came to Yuggoth from the ultimate voids - ought to be enough to make any man a Dante or Poe if he can keep sane long enough to tell what he has seen.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old April 16th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RosenMcStern View Post
3d6 is nonlinear (it is a bell curve). It is perfect for determining chances of success, as it naturally models casuality and statistics. It is less perfect when you have to design your own critters from scratch.

After designing hit location tables for weird monsters for years for RQ3, I can definitely state that 3d6 is a no-no unless you know that nothink non-humanoid is coming into play, and d100 is definitely more realistic, but a tidbit complicate. D20 is simple enough to design new creatures in a few minutes, and flexible enough to provide for a minimum of realism.
Eh... I found the tables in the Hero Bestiary seem to cover most weird monsters (winged creatures/humanoids, insects, wyrms, dragons, etc). I still find the advantages (high and low shots, rarity of head shots versus body shots, etc) outweigh the disadvantages of a linear system (even a d100 which is ultimately still a linear system).

Last edited by Tywyll : April 16th, 2008 at 22:00.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old April 16th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 186
Send a message via Skype™ to RosenMcStern
Default

High and low shots are in fact easier to do with d20 than with 3d6. Just roll 1d10 (low) or 1d10+10 (high). The point is that an unlinear progression of numbers does not guarantee that contiguous hit locations will be contiguous on the table. And please do not repeat "it's all done there". I know it is there. The point is that d20 allows you to easily design more monsters, the ones not yet invented. 3d6 does not.

As for the likeliness of head shots, with the missile hit loc table, it is one head shot in 20 versus one body shot in three. Seems fair enough to me.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old April 16th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 513
Default

I do OK with a D12...
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bingley, Yorkshire
Posts: 568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badcat View Post
We'll soon see. I mean I will, most of the people with the 0 edition seem pleased with the content.
Well, there is a lack of clarity over combat, especially the Attack/PArry Matrix. But Jason said he'd revisit that for 1st ed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by badcat View Post
I do OK with a D12...
Yes, the poor old D12 needs more use. And The Last Conformist's RW missile stats seem to show the probabilities are remarkably suited to either D6 or D12...

Head / Neck - 14%
Arm / Hand - 13%
Leg / Foot - 33%
Upper Trunk - 21%
Lower Trunk - 16%
Not Specified - 3%

...but the D12 wins, because the surprisingly low incidence of Arm hits means 1 pip on the D6 should be for both arms, whereas a D12 could differentiate them, with 1 face for left and 1 for right.
__________________
280/420
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008
GianniVacca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: France
Posts: 49
Send a message via MSN to GianniVacca Send a message via Yahoo to GianniVacca
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by soltakss View Post
But a D20 is quick and easy and we have hit locations for a lot of body types from older versions of the RQ rules.
Yes... that's a very good reason -- all those legacy bestiaries.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008
Kloster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: France
Posts: 403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frogspawner View Post
...But if you want simpler, faster, streamlined combat - why not just use BRP? The default, that is: no hit locations...
Heretic!!

Runequestement votre

Kloster
Reply With Quote
Reply Post New Thread



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by NuWiki v1.3 RC1 Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC