Basic Roleplaying Forum

Home Forum Downloads Reviews Wiki Gallery Links


Go Back   BRP Central > The Basic Roleplaying Forum > Basic Roleplaying
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old May 12th, 2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tywyll View Post
That's pretty cool. Perhaps starting skill in a spell could be different for hard spells and VHard spells. Though, the next question is: how do you learn them at character creation? Can you just put 1% into them and then get them at 30%+1%+Magic Category+Magery?
Isn't it redundant to add Magic category PLUS Magery if Magery and Magic category are functions of POW ?

I also think fatigue costs should be doubled to adequate MP costs.

I mean, casting a firebolt that deals 3d6 damage to a target with a 3 MPs expanse doesn't seem right to me, and most GURPS fatigue costs 1 to 4 fatigue points as far as I remember.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old May 12th, 2008
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lidingö, Sweden
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugen View Post
Isn't it redundant to add Magic category PLUS Magery if Magery and Magic category are functions of POW ?
Perhaps, I think a base chance around 35-40% is reasonable. Spells in Gurps are much more like recipes, they are not full-blown widely applicable skills, which IMHO warrants the relatively high base chance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugen View Post
I also think fatigue costs should be doubled to adequate MP costs.

I mean, casting a firebolt that deals 3d6 damage to a target with a 3 MPs expanse doesn't seem right to me, and most GURPS fatigue costs 1 to 4 fatigue points as far as I remember.
Ah, but a fireball only affects one target in Gurps. So a 3 MP fireball spell is functionally equivalent to the 3 MP Firearrow spirit magic spell. If you want to have an exploding fireball you'll have to spend much more MP. A 3d6 exploading fireball would cost you 3 x 2 = 6 MP and deliver 3d6 dam to everyone within 1 m, 2d6 to all within 3 m and 1d6 to all within 6 m. With either kind of fireball you'll need 17+ POW to do more than 3d6 dam.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugen View Post
Isn't it redundant to add Magic category PLUS Magery if Magery and Magic category are functions of POW ?
Yes, I've been struggling with that actually.

Quote:
I also think fatigue costs should be doubled to adequate MP costs.

I mean, casting a firebolt that deals 3d6 damage to a target with a 3 MPs expanse doesn't seem right to me, and most GURPS fatigue costs 1 to 4 fatigue points as far as I remember.
I disagree. 1 Fat in Gurps = 1d6 damage or 1 pt of armor. This is the same as it is now in BRP, at least in the Wizardry system. They are pretty much dead on equal.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterb View Post
Perhaps, I think a base chance around 35-40% is reasonable. Spells in Gurps are much more like recipes, they are not full-blown widely applicable skills, which IMHO warrants the relatively high base chance.
Which still leaves the problems of figuring out how a new character 'buys' spells with his starting points.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tywyll View Post
This is the same as it is now in BRP, at least in the Wizardry system. They are pretty much dead on equal.
Really ?

I had the following RuneQuest 3 references in mind :

A 1-point spirit magic spell deals 1d3 damage.
A 3-points divine magic spell (which means 3 POW were sacrified to learn this spell) deals 3d6 damage.
In Sandy Petersen's Sorcery rules, a X intensity spell deals "1dX" damage.

Yes, Firearrow and Fireblade have a higher damage/MP ratio, but they require a weapon to be effective.

Our references are very different
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2008
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lidingö, Sweden
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugen View Post
Really ?

I had the following RuneQuest 3 references in mind :

A 1-point spirit magic spell deals 1d3 damage.
A 3-points divine magic spell (which means 3 POW were sacrified to learn this spell) deals 3d6 damage.
In Sandy Petersen's Sorcery rules, a X intensity spell deals "1dX" damage.

Yes, Firearrow and Fireblade have a higher damage/MP ratio, but they require a weapon to be effective.

Our references are very different
But also note that the firearrow and fireblade spells replaces the damage of the weapon and the size of the weapon does not matter, its the fire that does the damage. And they also doesn't ignore armour (as disruption does).

The higher cost of divine magic is partly due to their near automatic chance of success and their long range and duration. I still think Gurps magic fits like a glove with the existing magic systems.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugen View Post
Really ?

I had the following RuneQuest 3 references in mind :

A 1-point spirit magic spell deals 1d3 damage.
A 3-points divine magic spell (which means 3 POW were sacrified to learn this spell) deals 3d6 damage.
In Sandy Petersen's Sorcery rules, a X intensity spell deals "1dX" damage.

Yes, Firearrow and Fireblade have a higher damage/MP ratio, but they require a weapon to be effective.

Our references are very different
Yeah, I'm referencing the new BRP Magic system. A character with Blast does 1d6 damage per MP (no hit locations). A character with fire/cold does 1d6 over an area, and each MP either increases that by d6 or increases the area.

I won't be playing with Hit locations, personally, so the BRP method (as well as the possible Gurps conversion) works just fine with the slightly higher damage.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 148
Default My Version of Sorcery...

Ok, so I've been kicking this idea around for a bit, and at first I was going to discard it, but then I came back to it. I'm thinking I can make it work for my world setting.

First off, I'm using the variant idea of college magic (single skill for all the spells in a group) as that fits the feel of 'Sorcery' in my home brew. Here is what I've come up with so far-

INNATE MAGIC
Innate Magic, otherwise known as Sorcery, is a potent magic that derives from the power of a being’s nature. Otherworldy beings, or those with such beings in their ancestry, can manipulate Mana on a subconscious level, their body acting as a filter, tuning the mana into a specific kind or effect.

New Skill:
Sorcery <type>(0%)-characters choose from a specific kind of Sorcery, based around their mystical ancestry. Typically this would represent their nature, so an Iron Blooded Tryshallan would possess ‘Green Sorcery’, while a Kharic-Dun probably wields ‘Earth Sorcery’ (though don’t call it magic to his face).

Sorcery is an exceptionally difficult skill to learn and master. At character creation it can be no higher than 40/50/75/90 (depending on the power level of the game). Each percentile in Sorcery costs 2 skill points.

A Sorcerer can potentially attempt any spell within their field of magic. Each spell they attempt is rolled against their Sorcery skill, with a -5% penalty for every prerequisite spell that it would normally require (per Gurps list). Spells cost a number of MP equal to the normal fatigue cost . Effects cost an additional 1 MP for every 2 full prerequisite spells they possess that the caster lacks skill in. Each spell the character has currently operating is an additional -5% to their casting skill. For example-Elith the Green Sorcerer wants to cast walk through Plants. He has no spell skills, just Sorcery at 40%. Walk through Plants has 6 Prerequisite spells, meaning it will be cast a -30% and cost an additional 3 MP. Even using Ceremony, he can only raise his chance to double, or 20%. Good luck! If he knew Hide Path and Heal Plant, that would reduce his penalty by 10% to a -20%. Using Ceremony he could then increase his 20% to a 40%. A bit better of a chance.

Sorcery cannot be improved with experience, and it takes twice the normal time of study or training to increase (so a character with a 30% in Sorcery would have to spend 60 hours in training before they would see a potential benefit).

Sorcerers can choose to learn spells. Learning a spell takes 50 hours of research/contemplation x the number of prerequisite spells (so the Walk through Plants spell would require 300 hours of research). If trained by someone or something that knows the spell, this study time can be reduced by ½. Alternatively, a Sorcerer could manifest a spell spontaneously, though this is costly (in Hero Points-it costs one HP per Prerequisite spell). Once a character has learned the spell through whatever means, it begins at a level equal to their chance of casting the spell (i.e. their Sorcery skill -5% per prerequisite spell, Elith could learn Walk through Plants at a base 10% chance, or 20% if he knew the other two prerequisite spells). The advantages of spending the effort to master the effect are that Spells can be improved with experience, training time on spells is normal, and the cost in MP is reduced to whatever it would normally be. If a Sorcerer’s Sorcery skill improves after developing a spell, it has no effect on the spell. Starting Sorcerers can buy spells at a 1 for 1 in skill points, based off their final Sorcery Skill.

Other Casting Modifiers:
Gestures with only one hand: -10 percentiles
no hand gestures at all: -20 percentiles
Softly spoken incantations: -10 percentiles
no incantation: -20 percentiles

When a Sorcerer’s skill reaches 75%, all costs to cast and maintain effects are reduced by 1. At 100%, and every 25% additional skill, they are reduced again. This can reduce the cost of a spell, or its maintenance, to 0. Remember, however, that there is a progressive penalty for every spell you maintain.

Skill Effects-
Fumble: The caster loses their next action and all the MP the effect would have cost.
Failure: The caster loses a single MP.
Success: The spell takes effect as normal, and the caster spends the normal amount of MP.
Special: The spell takes effect. Temporal spells have their base duration changed to multiplied by 5. The spell costs ½ MP.
Critical: The spell takes effect at a cost of 1 MP. Temporal spells have their base duration multiplied by 10.

Last edited by Tywyll; May 13th, 2008 at 11:15.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0