Basic Roleplaying Central |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Regardless, there is no legal "protection" for discussion, intellectual or otherwise, enshrined in English law. If someone wants to take action against a person or persons in such circumstances, they can do so providing they can establish a cause of action. Depending on the cause alleged there may be specific defenses (eg fair comment, qualified privilege etc in the case of defamation) but they cannot point to a specific right of free speech that would protect them.
|
|
||||
|
Precisely so, Paolo. I suspect you're right in that Greg won't join the list (rules in general are not a forte of his and he's certainly moved on from BRP), but he'll appreciate the courtesy. Thanks for doing this!
Gentlemen, let's move on...
__________________
Pray, and pass the ammunition |
|
|||
|
Agreed...........
__________________
My Glorantha fan site: http://www.clan-tula.co.uk |
|
||||
|
I think what I'd want is for Greg to do something similar to what Green Ronin has done with Freeport. Publish systemless books and license others to do the rulesey bits as they like. Something like that should keep most of us happy I think.
I doubt it'll happen, as I suppose it might require renegotiated deals with Mongoose and perhaps, Moon Design. But I can dream, can't I? If we're really lucky we'll get a 4th ed book.
|
|
||||
|
Hey, I'm all for such debate and tinkerings!
If there's a good solid case for changing something to fit the source material, I'm very happy to discuss. I agree that MRQ magic doesn't quite fit the Gloranthan bill as its stands.
__________________
Pray, and pass the ammunition |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|