Basic Roleplaying Central |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
It's 1/2 INT, round up, for spells held in memory and levels that can be cast for a trained mage; 1/4 of each, rounded down, for an untrained caster. Elves are mid range in both at 1/3, round up. Base %'s, INTx3% for four spells to start for the mage, 25% for any spells known for non-mages. There is no minimum POW or INT for learning magic, for anyone, under the rules. A non-mage has to have a very high INT and POW before he has much capability with magic at all...he does not even get to cast 3 levels until INT 12, nor 4 levels unless INT 16+. It's not really a worry, no one is going to get to be the best at combat and magic in this. A trained mage can cast 8 levels at INT 16, the most an untrained warrior can ever cast is 4 levels, as above. A warrior with a spell or two has an advantage but not an overwhelming one. The mage is limited in weapons in a similar way, I think it was DEX x 4% with any weapon known. But they can use any weapon.
|
|
|||
|
OK if nonmages are restricted to knowing 1/4 their int in spells then what restrictions are there on mages to even this out? For example I roll say 18 on str and con and 16 on power and int(I'm using loaded dice
) Whats to keep me from declaring myself a mage then go on my merry way being the best fighter in the game , but with a full load of spells.
|
|
|||
|
Nothing at all. In that case, enjoy your warrior-wizard.
Of course, with all 18s and 16s, you are going to pretty much have it all in any system, right? With your example, your main restriction as a fighter would be an upper weapon skill limit of 72%. With a DEX 18. |
|
|||
|
I went and checked, just because I was curious; in the original at least, being a non-magician did, indeed, only limit the number of spells you knew; there was no indication that the potency of spell was any more limited than as per usual for any spellcaster.
|
|
|||
|
As I said, you're correct about number of spells, but there's nothing special indicated about the level of spell they can cast. Check page 9 of the old MagicWorld book when you have time.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
The playtest draft didn't inlcude the old MW limit on mages Combat skills to DEX x 3 AFAICT - but since a mages spells are bought from their skill point pool at character creation, and training time in later play is a fixed resource, I'd say Mages were pretty effectively prevented from becoming combat monsters as well. If they spread their skill points too thinly they won't do anything well, and most professions that give access to Magic won't give access to a lot of combat skills, and in later play they havea limited amount of training time to spread between skills and spells... I am intrigued by the fact that Blast is 3pp per level now - that's a change from the playtest draft I have (and MW IIRC). Can't wait to see the finished book! Cheers, Nick Middleton |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Though I'm curious given that Jason has said the previous experience is a simple point distribution, how you distinguish a mage from a non-mage, especially since you indicate the skill limits for non-mages have gone away. What defines someone as a "mage"? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|