Thread: No Attributes? (Houserules)

Oh?

The people I know run both of those as written; though there has been some contention as to whether using the aging rules is a good idea, given the widely varying power levels it yields.

Originally Posted by Darkholme

Oh?

The people I know run both of those as written; though there has been some contention as to whether using the aging rules is a good idea, given the widely varying power levels it yields.

The Improvement Roll Modifier is supposed to reflect on the relationship the adventurer has with the community and peers. I think this is better handled through role-play.

I always thought aging rules where silly, more so now that I'm actually aging. But I suppose if your playing a generation spanning campaign they have their place. So players know when to retire their characters.

Heh.

I was referring more to the different character creation rules for characters of differing ages.

I'm inclined to agree with you about the Improvement Roll Modifier, but if you remove it, Charisma isn't very good.

My biggest gripe with this game (and many others) is that the characteristics (attributes in other games) are assigned the same "Price", but some of them are much more useful than others.