Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Just a silly rant about silly things (like the names of things)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Just a silly rant about silly things (like the names of things)

    It's late, I'm tired. This may be a silly thing (especially since I have yet to play these games)... I'm seeing what looks like a trend that I don't like and I want to start an official petition to stop it. And, that is, the use of the term "athletics" as a skill in a FANTASY-based game. Please, for the love of all that is holy, stop it people. lol

    For example, and I won't give the name of the game, some game that rhymes with Shroomquest decided it would be funny to lump "jumping, climbing, swimming, and throwing" all together under "athletics" while simultaneously making it a point to be so detailed as to require it's players to use hit points per location. What an odd combination.

    Do you guys have any idea how different climbing is from swimming? There are some amazing swimmers that can barely waddle on land. Some Olympic lifters can jump pretty high, but they aren't the best runners (putting it mildly), especially "over any distance".

    Also, do you know how hard it is for me to get the picture of a Gorgon wearing Reeboks out of my head? Gorgons are NOT.... athletic. They can swim maybe, and slither quickly...
    I dunno. And "brawn" when you already have a strength attribute? If someone can't apply their strength, then how would you know they were "strong?" But I digress. Such detailed distinctions... STR vs "brawn", hit locations.... "athletics". lol Lace up those Nike Air's Mr dragon and gimme 50!!

    Sounds petty, I know, but "athletics" is like the first skill I read under a lot of these monsters' descriptions. Starts with an 'a' I guess. And what's the deal with making skills not end in a '0' or '5' about? Okay, I'll shut up now. Goodnight.


    (If anything about this is inaccurate, just gimme the ol' "what fer". I'm half-way silly... no, but seriously!)


    EDIT: WHOOPS!! Swimming IS separate! My bad. lol Okay, but I still think the rest need to be broken out and the term "athletics" not used cuz it sounds funny on monsters. Kinda immersion breaking for me. I'm having trouble getting my 'mersion on.
    Last edited by j0nnyfive; January 17th, 2014 at 06:53.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Posts
    100
    Downloads
    43
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I don't get why you have to think "Reebok" when you read "athletics": http://listverse.com/2013/04/14/10-g...ient-athletes/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    The Reebok comment was for humor. Sorry.

    The main point is that when I think "athletics" I think of sporting competitions, or the preparation of sporting competitions. Doesn't "have" to be. But, I'm not sure why go to such lengths to be detailed in many areas (especially combat), and draw laser-like distinctions between hit locations and things like strength and brawn and 61% vs 60% skills... and then lump climbing, jumping, and running together using a word that conjures up thoughts of people lacing up their Reeboks and going for a run on the track. lol Other than this, it looks like a pretty charming game.

    (I checked out that link, they were still talking about sports, even though I acknowledge you don't have to be playing a sport to be considered athletic. According to my book, dragons are only 80% athletic so one may still be able to beat them in the discus) I'm a little delirious right now... sorry... lol It's just something that really jumps out at me since I have a background in physical training. I think they should go ahead and split athletics back out on their next go around. That's... just me.

    Back to trying to sleep...

    Edit: I'm not just picking on RQ. I'm looking at you to, OQ. Got my eye on ya... all you athletic monsters. Ghouls... I bet they can run a mean mile.
    Last edited by j0nnyfive; January 17th, 2014 at 09:15.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    40
    Downloads
    19
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I'm with you, at least sort of lol.

    D&D does something similar with their skills in 4.0. It's a way to consolidate skills for the sake of simplicity and to move the game along at a faster pace. Does it simulate reality better? - No. But it is quicker to lump skills under an applicable umbrella, as it were.

    I think what would bug me is the simplicity in one aspect while choosing a more sophisticated and detailed system for another aspect (such as hit locations). One would think that for the sake of continuity a game designer would use one approach across the board.

    Edit: Then again that's why I've chosen the BRP system and the use of the BGB. It's modular. Just swap which skills system you want.
    Last edited by Nakana; January 17th, 2014 at 09:30.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Posts
    100
    Downloads
    43
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j0nnyfive View Post
    The Reebok comment was for humor. Sorry.
    D'oh, sorry for not having gotten the drift.

    Your complaint of course makes sense, in fact old-school simulationist RPGs like the earlier editions of Runequest or Rolemaster or GURPS have long lists of very specific skills. I think the authors of the latest editions of RQ wanted to make a game that was more tightly focused on what characters in fantasy novels comics and movies actually spend most of their time doing. If (I haven't bought it yet) RQ6 has a single "athletics" skill covering all kinds of (dry land) physical feats, it might be not enough if, for example, you wanted your bronze age heoes to take part in the Olympics. Adding skills to a BRP based game, however, has always been a trivial task. And if it's the name that bothers you, just change it to one that you think is more evocative, like... I don't now, English is not my first language.
    Last edited by MatteoN; January 17th, 2014 at 09:40.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Yeah, I'm bugged too much by presentation of things. Word choice can really throw me. I'm too sensitive to this kind of stuff. My last rant was about skill ratings, but now I've got that lined out nicely. But this is something I think many game designers are starting to do more and more. This is just my opinion (I know), but you do NOT want to lump together the basic physical competencies such as jumping or climbing. You lose too much descriptive power I think. Dragons: climb 95%. To me, that sounds "scarier" than Dragons: athletics 95%. There just seems to be a trend of using "whatever" language "works" for the sake of convenience. Savage Worlds (a good set of rules, but the language!!): smarts. trappings. bennies. Sounds like a card game at an old southern baptist church or something. lol But you're supposed to use this game for Interface Zero? Wow. genre clash. Just my opinion, and etc.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    MatteoN, wow! Your English is great! A lot of times, I can tell when a person isn't naturally English, but I can't tell with you! Thanks for your comments guys!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sonthofen, Germany
    Posts
    2,505
    Downloads
    15
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Ah, well, I am guilty of using "Athletics" to cover Climb, Jump, Run and Swim, "Stealth" to
    cover Hide and Sneak, and so on.

    Actually I am using the Root/Branch skill system of the Ringworld RPG, where a character
    first develops a general ability (in the case of Athletics a general fitness and agility) as a
    Root Skill and then specializes in one or more of the Branch Skills (in the case of Athletics
    for example Climb, Jump, Run or Swim - the character can do all that with his Root Skill,
    too, but not very well).

    The reason to use the general Root Skills is to avoid skill creep, which otherwise can ruin
    especially a science fiction setting rather quickly. There are lots and lots of potentially use-
    ful skills, especially technical and scientific ones, but there is only a limited amount of skill
    points, so keeping the number of skills low in order to enable the characters to be good at
    a sufficient number of important skills is a necessity.

    As for the term "Athletics", I see it as one which is easy to understand and to connect with
    physical skills which require physical fitness. The original meaning would be "Competitor"
    (in the sports of classical Greece), but since few people will know this, I do not care.
    "Mind like parachute, function only when open."
    (Charlie Chan)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,066
    Downloads
    58
    Uploads
    7

    Default

    The goal was to use the broad skills to help simplify the amount of bookkeeping- especially for NPCs that won't be showing up again.

    Athletics isn't all that unreasonable. Those people who are gifted at running tend to be above average at jumping, climbing and swimming.
    Smiley when you say that.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,332
    Downloads
    26
    Uploads
    5

    Default

    RE: Keeping it simple. The James Bond RPG had the skill Science, encompassing everything. And GURPS: Atomic Horror had Science!, for those Benton Quest, Reed Richards and Doctor Who types who can always come up with a plausible sounding solution, no matter what the situation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •